Entries Stats:
Photographers — 17
Feature — 19
News — 14
Sports — 9
Portrait — 26
Multi Photo — 2 entries/36 photos
Disclaimer from the POM team: The judge reclassified some photos into a different category than when it was submitted. We understand judges normally don't do this. We believe as a team that the competition should be educational, rather than competitive. Students at Loyalist College would be able to benefit from seeing where photos should have been entered. Submitting photos into the right category is an art of editing itself. We hope by allowing these reclassification made by the judge, students are able to take away something from that. This does not mean students should randomly submit in the future and hope the judge would reclassify the submissions for them.
FEATUREPhotographers — 17
Feature — 19
News — 14
Sports — 9
Portrait — 26
Multi Photo — 2 entries/36 photos
Disclaimer from the POM team: The judge reclassified some photos into a different category than when it was submitted. We understand judges normally don't do this. We believe as a team that the competition should be educational, rather than competitive. Students at Loyalist College would be able to benefit from seeing where photos should have been entered. Submitting photos into the right category is an art of editing itself. We hope by allowing these reclassification made by the judge, students are able to take away something from that. This does not mean students should randomly submit in the future and hope the judge would reclassify the submissions for them.
Judge's comments: The first place photo proves your feature photos don't have to be in your face. There's always a place for this type of photo. It was a pleasure to see someone be patient and make a photo that was unlike anything else entered, it easily stood out above the rest. To nitpick though it could be even better if some of the top and some of the right side of the frame were cropped out to balance the lighthouse and the person better.
Second and third place were the best of the rest. In the second place photo the power pole and the power lines need to be cropped out, better yet take a step to the right and fix this at the moment the photo is made in camera. It's important to watch the edges and corners to be certain nothing distracting is creeping into the frame. Easily fixed by cropping the top and right side of the image.
The third place image shows a photographer paying attention to what's around him or her and not just the obvious although this image too could benefit from a crop to balance things out and draw more attention to the subject. Crop the top considerably and the right side to near the edge of the backpack. Third place was pulled over to feature from portrait and was better than the remaining feature entries.
Too many entries were shot or cropped awkwardly tight. There was an image of a sledder flying through the air but it was either shot or cropped so tight vertically that it killed any impact the photo might have had. In all the categories there were too many tightly cropped vertical images that would have next to no chance of being used in a publication whether it be print or online. The majority of photos used are horizontal, it's evolved that way because of website usage. Take a look around the news portal and newspaper websites across the country and count how many vertical photos are on the main page. The number is likely to be next to none.
Sometimes you just need to take a step back or pay more attention to what is around you when you're working. Many times the best moment will be behind you or just off frame. Be aware, show some context and give your photos some room to breathe. Give the person who will be using your photos options by not close cropping them. Make sure they are balanced, don't crop one side right up to the subject and then leave a mile of dead space. It's okay to have negative space just make sure the area where your subject is has room to breathe.
Lastly on features, just go out and make a nice photo that is visually pleasing. This should have been the easiest category to submit entries for and it ended up being one of the disappointments to judge. It was January, you've either now been in school a few months or completed a full year on top of that. Get out of your car, go for a walk and be patient. I know for a fact there's better to be had out there than kids sledding down a hill and statues covered in snow.
1. Anica James
2. Bradley Ruszkowski
3. Hannah Yoon (Originally submitted as Portrait)
NEWS
3. Hannah Yoon (Originally submitted as Portrait)
NEWS
Judge's comments: Lots of miscategorized photos. The top three were all entered in other categories but due to the lack of quality entries they have been pulled over to news. One was entered as a portrait and the other two were entered as features when they are all clearly news photos.
2. Giovanni Capriotti
3. Emily Cumming
SPORTS
Judge's comments: The sports category was a disappointment, the lack of entries and the quality of images left much to be desired. There's no excuse for not getting out there and working your butt off to make good sports images. Take a chance and try a position you might not immediately think of. You don't necessarily need a long lens to make a good sports photo. Pick a spot, let the action come to you and make images you are proud of. It should be standard by this point in your schooling that you can go out to a sporting event and make storytelling or just pleasing to look at sports pictures.
Judge's comments: There were only two entries and although the winner chosen needed to be edited down to 6 or 7 photos from 10 it was still clearly better than the other entry. The other entry had 26 photos, didn't have captions, most were cropped badly, some were poorly exposed and the colour balance was all over the place. It also lacked focus, had no flow and could have easily been edited down to just a handful of images. Twenty-six photos is just too many in this case.
First place winner was chosen because of the emotion conveyed and because the photographer saw something other than the ordinary. The subject genuinely looks concerned and although the caption had to be read to determine what was going on it all makes sense and any editor would be happy to have this photo to go along with the story.
Second place is another case of seeing something other than the obvious although I'm not sure why it was entered as a feature when the keywords field in the iptc clearly had "spot news" filled in. Third place might have placed higher if the crop had been cleaned up - video camera poking into the right side of the frame and the two photographers in the background. Crop the bottom and the sides. Honourable mention goes to the photographer who found something different at what could have been a mundane protest march. Nitpicking small details here but it would have been better if the photographer could have waited another moment until the two people taking photos and the man in the glasses moved along and weren't looking right at you.
It's fairly easy to find out about news events going on these days so there's no excuse for not getting out there and shooting more. Even the day-to-day protests, news conferences etc. can yield good pictures if you look for them.
1. Anica James (Originally submitted as portrait)
2. Alistair Maitland (Originally submitted as feature)
3. Solana Cain (Originally submitted as feature)
PORTRAIT
2. Alistair Maitland (Originally submitted as feature)
3. Solana Cain (Originally submitted as feature)
PORTRAIT
Judge's comments: The winners easily stood out above the other entries here. First place had good colour and a clean background but I debated whether it was a portrait or a feature. In the end it was the most eye-catching and just barely won out over the second place image. This photo would have gone from good to great if the photographer had kept the bottom of the hut in and we could see the surface it was directly sitting on. Wondering if this is a case of centre-point autofocus since the subject's head is dead centre in the frame. Focus and recompose or take a step back. More room on the bottom would balance the frame better.
1. Hannah Yoon
Second place was tough for me because the painting on the wall is unnecessary, the subject itself is so striking that if it was just a nice horizontal frame of him sitting in that chair with a clean wall behind him it would have jumped straight to first place and would have been one of the best images entered in any category for the month. Don't over-complicate things, many times just keeping things simple will yield the best result.
Third place is a nice moment between mom and son and proves a portrait doesn't have to be someone sitting or standing there for you. The two of them seem to have forgot you are there - well done. You've brought the viewer/reader into their world. Would be nice to have a bit more room at the bottom so the frame isn't cropped right up to his foot and maybe a bit of room of the left to balance the frame better.
Honourable mention was pulled from sports and could have placed much higher in the portrait category had the photographer cropped out the bottom of the image. He or she has clearly gone to the trouble of setting up two lights so use that to your advantage. By cropping the bottom and having just the subject and his two shadows you go from a very pedestrian photo to something striking. Also give the top and sides a bit of room to breathe so the edges of your frame aren't all the way into subject's shadows.
2. Giovanni Capriotti
3. Emily Cumming
SPORTS
Judge's comments: The sports category was a disappointment, the lack of entries and the quality of images left much to be desired. There's no excuse for not getting out there and working your butt off to make good sports images. Take a chance and try a position you might not immediately think of. You don't necessarily need a long lens to make a good sports photo. Pick a spot, let the action come to you and make images you are proud of. It should be standard by this point in your schooling that you can go out to a sporting event and make storytelling or just pleasing to look at sports pictures.
The three photos chosen were simply better than the rest of the entries. First place was clearly the winner with fist connected to face and a clean background. Second place was clean but could have been cropped better. Third place was the best of the rest and nice to see something other than action on the field of play. Nice work by the photographer paying attention to what was happening on the sidelines.
1. Dillan Cools
2. Hannah Yoon
3. Dillan Cools
MULTI-PICTURE
2. Hannah Yoon
3. Dillan Cools
MULTI-PICTURE
1. Justin Chin
2. NOT AWARDED
3. NOT AWARDED
2. NOT AWARDED
3. NOT AWARDED
Points awarded
250 — Anica James
175 — Hannah Yoon
125 — Dillan Cools
110 — Justin Chin
50 — Bradley Ruszkowski
50 — Alistar Maitland
50 — Giovanni Capriotti
25 — Emily Cumming
25 — Solana Cain
10 — Bryan Eneas
25 — Solana Cain
10 — Bryan Eneas